Re: Defaults for PKG_DEVELOPER=yes

To: David Brownlee <abs%absd.org@localhost>, "tech-pkg%NetBSD.org@localhost" <tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Defaults for PKG_DEVELOPER=yes
From: Roland Illig <roland.illig%gmx.de@localhost>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 20:27:05 +0100

Am 10.12.2024 um 10:09 schrieb David Brownlee:
> What would people think of defaulting PKG_DEVELOPER=yes, *but*
> ensuring each additionally enabled check's failure message included
> words to the effect:
>
> "Rerun the failing command with PKG_DEVELOPER=no to skip this check"
>
> Potentially renaming/inverting the variable might also make sense

I fully agree, as PKG_DEVELOPER=no skips very basic sanity checks.

Roland

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Defaults for PKG_DEVELOPER=yes
  - From: David Brownlee

References:
- Defaults for PKG_DEVELOPER=yes
  - From: David Brownlee

Prev by Date: lang/gcc1[34] do not build on Darwin when lang/libunwind is installed
Next by Date: lang/gcc1[34] fails to build on Darwin 24 + Xcode 16
Previous by Thread: Re: Defaults for PKG_DEVELOPER=yes
Next by Thread: Re: Defaults for PKG_DEVELOPER=yes
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index