Re: Heads-up: SUBST blocks are stricter now

To: Mike Pumford <mpumford%mudcovered.org.uk@localhost>, tech-pkg <tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost>, pkgsrc-users <pkgsrc-users%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Heads-up: SUBST blocks are stricter now
From: Roland Illig <roland.illig%gmx.de@localhost>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 14:14:27 +0200

On 17.05.2020 13:26, Mike Pumford wrote:


If you notice any package that fails with a [subst.mk] error message,
please tell me, and if you cannot fix it yourself, I'll do that.

For further details, see the documentation in mk/subst.mk.

I assume this is fallout in pkgtools/pkgin:

=> Adjusting path.
WARNING: [subst.mk:path] Nothing changed in "actions.c".
WARNING: [subst.mk:path] Nothing changed in "pkgin.1".
ERROR: [subst.mk:path] The filename patterns "actions.c pkgin.1" have no
effect.


Thanks, fixed in pkgtools/pkgin/Makefile 1.101.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Heads-up: SUBST blocks are stricter now
  - From: Chavdar Ivanov

References:
- Heads-up: SUBST blocks are stricter now
  - From: Roland Illig
- Re: Heads-up: SUBST blocks are stricter now
  - From: Mike Pumford

Prev by Date: Re: Heads-up: SUBST blocks are stricter now
Next by Date: rust and llvm dependency
Previous by Thread: Re: Heads-up: SUBST blocks are stricter now
Next by Thread: Re: Heads-up: SUBST blocks are stricter now
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index