Heads-up: SUBST blocks are stricter now

[Roland Illig <roland.illig%gmx.de@localhost>]

On 16.05.2020 21:02, Roland Illig wrote:
> Module Name:	pkgsrc
> Committed By:	rillig
> Date:		Sat May 16 19:02:32 UTC 2020
>
> Log Message:
> mk/subst.mk: change default value for SUBST_NOOP_OK from yes to no
>
> This makes the SUBST blocks stricter than before, to detect outdated or
> unnecessary definitions.
>
> Filename patterns that are not affected by any of the SUBST_SED
> expressions make the build fail.  It is still ok if only some of the
> files from a pattern are affected and some aren't.
>
> The latest bulk build shows that most of the build failures are fixed.
> The packages that fail in that build are mostly due to other failures,
> like missing C headers, wrong PLIST files, unresolved references at link
> time.  There may be a few packages that still fail because of this, but
> these are near the leaves of the dependency tree.
>
> https://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-bulk/2020/05/14/msg018919.html

If you notice any package that fails with a [subst.mk] error message,
please tell me, and if you cannot fix it yourself, I'll do that.

For further details, see the documentation in mk/subst.mk.