Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers

To: Jason Bacon <bacon4000%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
From: "William J. Coldwell" <cryo%cryo.ws@localhost>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 20:58:50 -0600

This made me die a little inside.

@Cryo - William J. Coldwell @Infrascale - InfoSec Technomage
@Warped - CTO @deadjournal @NetBSD - President/Chairperson
PGP: 0xF97CC215/0x5E994445 ARIN: WC25/AS7769 [self opinion];
"Put on 3D glasses, otherwise you only see in 1½D.”

On Sep 1, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Jason Bacon <bacon4000%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:

Perl is required for building gcc-c++

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: Jason Bacon

References:
- Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: coypu
- Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: Jason Bacon
- Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: coypu
- Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: Jason Bacon
- Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: Jason Bacon

Prev by Date: Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
Next by Date: Re: PKG_SYSCONFDIR.${PKG_SYSCONFVAR}
Previous by Thread: Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
Next by Thread: Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index