"Sevan / Venture37" <venture37%gmail.com@localhost> writes: > On 14 April 2017 at 15:50, Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> wrote: >> The upcoming LLVM linker might be locked with its corresponding LLVM >> release. This will enforce us to new enough llvm+clang+lld+lldb in the >> same version or go for bundling all of them and in the result link >> several libraries with different versions of LLD. > > I'd not thought about the Clang side of things. > According to http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html > Clang 3.3 for C++11 > Clang 3.4 for C++14 It seems clang is at least somewhat less pesky than gcc about this sort of thing, but the same logic of having a standard version and versions that are ok for various languages seems applicable. This is a reason to make packages declare language versions more than gcc versions.
Description: PGP signature