>>> The TrueCrypt software is under a poor license, which is not only >>> non-free, but has the potential to be actively dangerous to end users or >>> distributors who agree to it, opening them to possible legal action even >>> if they abide by all of the licensing terms, depending on the intent of >>> the upstream copyright holder. >> >> There may be truth behind this, but it's written in a FUD style. >> > > Please continue it off-list. Huh? I don't follow your comment at all. The quoted text makes assertions with no analysis, and that's bogus.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature