tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: wanderer

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 08:20:59AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
 > > The current defaults are reasonable for making good packages, so
 > > running "pkglint" alone is usually enough.
 > My point is really that we more or less have "clean pkglint run" as a
 > quality standard (modulo that clean on 1.4 or 1.5 is acceptable for
 > import or update).  So that should correspond to the default invocation.

Although note that pkglint (without -Wall -Call) on a clean tree
produces about 40,000 lines of output. (With -Wall -Call it's about

We should work on that :-|

 > Overall, I think we should only ask people to fix things that are actual
 > bugs, are failures to meet documented standards in the guide, or are
 > widely understood to be incorrect (and no one has gotten to document
 > them but should).  Some of the things in the extra options probably fall
 > into that category, and I'd like to see those as default, basically
 > using "would you expect someone to fix this" as the test.


David A. Holland

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index