[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Thoughts about bringing back old bulk build system
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 15:00:50 -0400
From: Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>
Agreed. While natively working would be nice, running the pbulk master
on a big-memory box and using the native ones to acutally do builds
sounds good. Then one could distcc to cross-compile, and eventually
make more of pkgsrc crossbuildable.
The main barrier to bulk cross-builds is simply that pbulk doesn't
understand the distinction between cross- and native-builds, nor
between BUILD_DEPENDS and TOOL_DEPENDS.
I would be happy to help a volunteer out with teaching pbulk about
these things -- I just don't have time for it myself. If you're
interested, see my AsiaBSDcon 2015 talk on the subject for some
The secondary barrier is the highly-depended packages such as Perl and
Python that don't cross-build currently. Short of fixing them to
cross-build properly, one could invent a mechanism (or just do it
manually) to build them natively, perhaps using distcc, and copy the
binary packages to the cross-building host.
Main Index |
Thread Index |