Re: graphics/jpeg Vs graphics/libjpeg-turbo

To: David Brownlee <abs%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: graphics/jpeg Vs graphics/libjpeg-turbo
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:31:12 +0100

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:11:13AM +0000, David Brownlee wrote:
> [...]
> Swapping out shared libraries at runtime rather than compile time makes
> me somewhat twitchy :)
> 
> Maybe we run a test bulk build with libjpeg-turbo, test it and if it works 
> just
> switch to it by default on i386 & amd64?

Do the Intel Atom actually have the needed instructions ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--

References:
- graphics/jpeg Vs graphics/libjpeg-turbo
  - From: david . sainty
- Re: graphics/jpeg Vs graphics/libjpeg-turbo
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: graphics/jpeg Vs graphics/libjpeg-turbo
  - From: David Sainty
- Re: graphics/jpeg Vs graphics/libjpeg-turbo
  - From: David Brownlee

Prev by Date: Re: Building recode
Next by Date: Re: Moving mk.conf (Was: Making it easier to get and use pkgsrc)
Previous by Thread: Re: graphics/jpeg Vs graphics/libjpeg-turbo
Next by Thread: Re: graphics/jpeg Vs graphics/libjpeg-turbo
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index