tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkgsrc performance
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 05:46:44PM +0100, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:47:59PM +0100, Roland Illig wrote:
> > Quentin Garnier schrieb:
> > > Also, it gains very little to modify the bl3.mk files that don't include
> > > any other, which I think is a big part of them, so we can concentrate on
> > > those who include other bl3.mk files first.
> > >
> > > I intend to have a try at descending the include tree from
> > > gnome-control-center and see how much of an impact each level makes.
> >
> > I did exactly this, and after modifying only six files (somewhere in the
> > middle of the GNOME dependencies), the parsing time went down to 3
> > seconds. Before, it had been 20 seconds.
>
> I've just done the whole top level for gnome-control-center and it went
> down from ~49 seconds to ~6.
>
> There is a big jump very early when doing that. I can only speculate,
> but I think we would hit some limit in make after which it went into
> some degenerated and very slow state. Either because it keeps a list
> of all file ever included somewhere, or because of the ever-growing
> BUILDLINK_ORDER variable.
>
> Speaking of BUILDLINK_ORDER, I'd like to tweak slightly my proposal for
> how bl3.mk files should look like, and move BUILDLINK_ORDER management
> in the space executed at every inclusion. It does make it grow larger,
> but it will make show-buildlnk3 output more useful than if it only shows
> the location of the first inclusion. An alternative is to manage it
> both in the "first inclusion" part and the "top-level inclusion" part,
> but it's a bit more complicated.
So what's to do to speed pkgsrc up?
Thomas
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index