Re: DHCP vs RARP?

[Edgar Fuß <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>]

> Replicating most of the declaration just to make up for deficiencies in
> the parser is...aesthetically offensive, is perhaps the best short
> description.  (It's also annoyingly tedious to add a new address to.)
It doen't need to be a defiency of the parser. Probably the rest of the code 
needs a one-to-one relation between host and hardware-address?