Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost> writes: > (personal note) > It really seems to me that the current module sub-systems is at > best a second-class capability. I often get the feeling that > others don't really care about modules, until it's the only way > to provide something else (dtrace). This proposal feels like > another nail in the modular coffin. Rather than disabling (part > of) the module feature, we should find ways to improve testing > the feature. I'd just like to say that while I haven't gone down the "modules first" path, I have been watching your commits and cheering you on. I do use a few modules, and this is making me think I should try to run MODULAR, especially on machines with less memory. I'm a little scared of not even having UFS, but I can try it as the low-memory machine is not important.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature