Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> writes: > I think that all modules that we deliver and declare safe for *autoload* > should require to be actually tested, and a basic test (for me) includes > testing auto-unload. That does not cover races that slip through "casual" > testing, but should have caught the worst bugs. That's a reasonable position for adding modules, but > So the error in the cases you stumbled in is the autoload and keeping the > badly tested module autoloadable but forbid its unloading sounds a bit > strange to me. Given where we are, do you really mean we should withdraw every module from autoload that does not have a documented test result, right now? It seems far better to have them stay loaded than be unavailable.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature