Port-xen by date

Last updated: Tue Oct 19 16:05:26 2010
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 1 of 2009/05
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Sun, 31 May 2009
21:23 Re: Cannot start xend: ERROR Internal error: Could (2) Jean-Yves Migeon
20:53 Re: Cannot start xend: ERROR Internal error: Could (1) Stephane Bortzmeyer
20:43 Re: Cannot start xend: ERROR Internal error: Could (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
20:28 Cannot start xend: ERROR Internal error: Could not (2) Stephane Bortzmeyer
18:51 Re: Problems with PCI passthrough (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
17:25 Re: Problems with PCI passthrough (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
04:07 Problems with PCI passthrough (3) Brian Marcotte
Thu, 28 May 2009
23:36 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (0) Sarton O'Brien
20:52 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (1) Manuel Bouyer
20:48 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (1) Dan Engholm
20:37 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (1) Manuel Bouyer
20:31 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (0) Manuel Bouyer
20:27 Re: pygrub?? (0) Manuel Bouyer
19:37 Re: xend gets SIGBUS and cores under -current (0) Jonathan A. Kollasch
13:35 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (0) Jean-Yves Migeon
11:18 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
08:05 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (2) Dan Engholm
07:56 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (1) Dan Engholm
06:50 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (2) Dan Engholm
Wed, 27 May 2009
00:55 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (1) Sarton O'Brien
Tue, 26 May 2009
23:17 Re: xend gets SIGBUS and cores under -current (0) Sarton O'Brien
12:40 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
11:23 Re: pygrub?? (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
07:06 disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (3) Dan Engholm
05:34 xen3 amd64 not working under current [was Re: xend (0) Sarton O'Brien
00:07 pygrub?? (1) joe mcguckin
Mon, 25 May 2009
23:30 xen3 amd64 not working under current [was Re: xen (0) Sarton O'Brien
Sun, 24 May 2009
10:53 Re: xend gets SIGBUS and cores under -current (0) Sarton O'Brien
00:48 Re: xend gets SIGBUS and cores under -current (0) Jonathan A. Kollasch
Sat, 23 May 2009
13:24 Re: Linux domU ?? (0) matthew sporleder
07:49 Linux domU ?? (1) joe mcguckin
Fri, 22 May 2009
21:35 Re: Windows GPLPV Drivers under NetBSD/amd64 dom0? (0) Stephen Borrill
07:51 Re: xend gets SIGBUS and cores under -current (4) Sarton O'Brien
Thu, 21 May 2009
04:48 Windows GPLPV Drivers under NetBSD/amd64 dom0? (1) Dustin Marquess
Wed, 20 May 2009
21:25 Re: Xen emulated network cards (was Re: FreeBSD HV (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
20:56 Re: Xen emulated network cards (was Re: FreeBSD HV (0) Jonathan A. Kollasch
20:37 Re: Xen emulated network cards (was Re: FreeBSD HV (1) Stephen Borrill
19:57 Re: Xen emulated network cards (was Re: FreeBSD HV (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
18:58 Xen emulated network cards (was Re: FreeBSD HVM gu (1) Stephen Borrill
Mon, 18 May 2009
23:29 Re: xend gets SIGBUS and cores under -current (1) Sarton O'Brien
21:07 Re: xend gets SIGBUS and cores under -current (2) Manuel Bouyer
19:22 xend gets SIGBUS and cores under -current (2) Jonathan A. Kollasch
Sun, 17 May 2009
11:15 Re: PCI passthrough (0) Christoph Egger
10:12 Re: PCI passthrough (1) Manuel Bouyer
07:46 Re: PCI passthrough (0) Christoph Egger
07:45 Re: PCI passthrough (1) Sam Fourman Jr.
07:28 Re: PCI passthrough (1) Christoph Egger
Sat, 16 May 2009
23:54 PCI passthrough (2) Sam Fourman Jr.
Tue, 12 May 2009
07:17 Re: FreeBSD HVM guests? (0) Christoph Egger
07:10 Re: FreeBSD HVM guests? (1) Manuel Bouyer
05:42 Re: FreeBSD HVM guests? (1) Christoph Egger
Mon, 11 May 2009
23:17 Re: FreeBSD HVM guests? (2) Hugo Silva
21:02 Re: Renaming our Xen packages (0) Greg Troxel
20:57 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (0) Manuel Bouyer
20:54 Re: Renaming our Xen packages (1) Manuel Bouyer
20:48 Re: FreeBSD HVM guests? (1) Manuel Bouyer
20:41 Re: FreeBSD HVM guests? (1) Steven M. Bellovin
20:23 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
14:15 Re: FreeBSD HVM guests? (1) Manuel Bouyer
13:50 FreeBSD HVM guests? (1) Hugo Silva
12:50 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (1) Manuel Bouyer
12:44 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
12:33 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (0) Manuel Bouyer
12:15 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (1) Christoph Egger
12:01 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (2) Manuel Bouyer
11:58 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
11:54 Re: Renaming our Xen packages (1) Martti Kuparinen
11:30 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (1) Manuel Bouyer
11:08 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
10:59 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (1) Manuel Bouyer
Sat, 09 May 2009
12:12 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (0) Christoph Egger
11:18 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (2) Jean-Yves Migeon
07:59 Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (1) Christoph Egger
Fri, 08 May 2009
11:27 [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
Thu, 07 May 2009
20:30 Re: Network Configuration (0) Robert Swindells
15:11 Re: Some questions about x86/xen pmap (0) Manuel Bouyer
15:04 Re: Network Configuration (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
14:59 Re: Some questions about x86/xen pmap (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
14:43 Network Configuration (1) Robert Swindells
14:28 Re: Some questions about x86/xen pmap (1) Manuel Bouyer
14:16 Re: Some questions about x86/xen pmap (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
08:10 Re: Some questions about x86/xen pmap (1) Manuel Bouyer
05:53 Re: Some questions about x86/xen pmap (0) Christoph Egger
Wed, 06 May 2009
23:04 Re: Some questions about x86/xen pmap (2) Jean-Yves Migeon
11:18 Re: PCI passthrough corrupting data? (0) Manuel Bouyer
Tue, 05 May 2009
18:57 PCI passthrough corrupting data? (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
Mon, 04 May 2009
21:02 Re: Some questions about x86/xen pmap (1) Andrew Doran
10:06 Re: dom0 -> domU packet loss (0) Manuel Bouyer
09:06 Re: High packet loss in netbsd-5.0 domU (0) Anup Patil
Sun, 03 May 2009
23:47 Re: dom0 -> domU packet loss (1) Brian Marcotte
Sat, 02 May 2009
23:15 Re: High interrupt when using 'dd' with Xen DOM0 k (0) Jean-Edouard Babin
22:12 Re: High interrupt when using 'dd' with Xen DOM0 k (1) Manuel Bouyer
20:15 Re: High interrupt when using 'dd' with Xen DOM0 k (1) Jean-Edouard Babin
18:20 Re: dom0 -> domU packet loss (1) Manuel Bouyer
17:24 Re: High packet loss in netbsd-5.0 domU (1) Manuel Bouyer
10:51 Re: High interrupt when using 'dd' with Xen DOM0 k (1) Manuel Bouyer
01:47 High interrupt when using 'dd' with Xen DOM0 kerne (1) Jean-Edouard Babin
Fri, 01 May 2009
16:03 Re: troubleshooting I/O performance bottleneck (0) Manuel Bouyer
15:58 Re: troubleshooting I/O performance bottleneck (1) Thor Lancelot Simon


Page 1 of 2009/05
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc