Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?

To: Rin Okuyama <rokuyama.rk%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
From: Tobias Nygren <tnn%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 14:08:31 +0200

On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 17:43:16 +0900
Rin Okuyama <rokuyama.rk%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:

> If not, I will bump BOOTXX_SECTORS for amd64 in few days.

Would it be on the table to only bump it for HAVE_LLVM to
keep the status quo for official builds?

Side note I think there are other issues with boot code built with
clang. For example I've encountered that bootx64.efi hangs for
me when built with clang.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
  - From: Rin Okuyama
- Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
  - From: Greg Troxel

References:
- bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
  - From: Rin Okuyama

Prev by Date: Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Next by Date: Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Previous by Thread: Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Next by Thread: Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index