Re: RFH: let us know if PCRE2 with JIT will work for you

To: Carlo Arenas <carenas%gmail.com@localhost>, port-arm%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: RFH: let us know if PCRE2 with JIT will work for you
From: Lloyd Parkes <lloyd%must-have-coffee.gen.nz@localhost>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:24:11 +1300

On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 19:52 +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> 
> This is bad, sljit needs to do the remap dance to avoid W+X mappings.

It turns out that sljit has code to do this if
SLJIT_PROT_EXECUTABLE_ALLOCATOR is defined, but that isn't defined by
default and PCRE2 didn't seem to define it when I ran my tests. 

Cheers,
Lloyd

References:
- RFH: let us know if PCRE2 with JIT will work for you
  - From: Carlo Arenas
- Re: RFH: let us know if PCRE2 with JIT will work for you
  - From: Lloyd Parkes
- Re: RFH: let us know if PCRE2 with JIT will work for you
  - From: Lloyd Parkes
- Re: RFH: let us know if PCRE2 with JIT will work for you
  - From: Carlo Arenas
- Re: RFH: let us know if PCRE2 with JIT will work for you
  - From: Lloyd Parkes
- Re: RFH: let us know if PCRE2 with JIT will work for you
  - From: Martin Husemann

Prev by Date: Re: RFH: let us know if PCRE2 with JIT will work for you
Next by Date: Re: RFH: let us know if PCRE2 with JIT will work for you
Previous by Thread: Re: RFH: let us know if PCRE2 with JIT will work for you
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index