Re: licensing issues (was Re: jdk request)

[Todd Vierling <tv%duh.org@localhost>]

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Geert Hendrickx wrote:

> > I *HIGHLY* recommend not putting context patches into pkgsrc-wip.  If you
> > must do this, use simple ed-script patches only (e.g., "diff -e") to make
> > sure context is not included.
>
> Are things ok as they are in wip/jdk14 at the moment?  Or should all
> existing patches/ be converted to diff -e format?

I'd recommend converting them, committing, and then doing "cvs admin -o" for
all the previous revisions of the patch files.  Doing so would put the jdk14
package into at least questionable, rather than bad, legal status.  8-)

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <tv%duh.org@localhost> <tv%pobox.com@localhost> 
<todd%vierling.name@localhost>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss