pkgsrc-WIP-discuss archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
licensing issues (was Re: jdk request)
- To: Todd Vierling <tv%duh.org@localhost>
- Subject: licensing issues (was Re: jdk request)
- From: Geert Hendrickx <geert.hendrickx%ua.ac.be@localhost>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:17:01 +0200 See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 1.0 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:49:39AM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
> Be aware that this has M-A-J-O-R licensing issues with the SCSL. This is
> the reason that my jdk12 and jdk13 patches were removed from CVS altogether
> -- no revisions of their files remain.
>
> I *HIGHLY* recommend not putting context patches into pkgsrc-wip. If you
> must do this, use simple ed-script patches only (e.g., "diff -e") to make
> sure context is not included.
Are things ok as they are in wip/jdk14 at the moment? Or should all
existing patches/ be converted to diff -e format?
GH
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index