pkgsrc-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: NetBSD 10.0/x86_64 bulk build status
Hi,
Thomas Klausner <wiz%gatalith.at@localhost> writes:
> Hi!
>
> Inline you can find the status of the latest 10.0/x86_64 bulk build.
>
> If I remember the setup of the bulk build correctly, it will not
> rebuild recursively, so if foo has a fix that affects bar, but bar's
> version number or files are not changed, it is not rebuilt and will
> stay broken (and the other way round).
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 06:09:24PM +0000, Charlie Root wrote:
>> pkgsrc bulk build report
>> ========================
>>
>> NetBSD 10.0/x86_64
>> Compiler: gcc
>>
>> Build start: 2025-06-22 03:40
>> Build end: 2025-06-22 18:05
>>
>> Full report: https://releng.netbsd.org/pkgreports/shadow/HEAD/NetBSD-10.0-x86_64/20250622.0340/meta/report.html
>> Machine readable version: https://releng.netbsd.org/pkgreports/shadow/HEAD/NetBSD-10.0-x86_64/20250622.0340/meta/report.bz2
>>
>> Total number of packages: 28447
>> Successfully built: 27333
>> Failed to build: 25
>> Depending on failed package: 25
>> Explicitly broken or masked: 988
>> Depending on masked package: 76
>>
>> Packages breaking the most other packages
>>
>> Package Breaks Maintainer
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> devel/bazel 10 ryoon%NetBSD.org@localhost
>
> external/upb/upb/mini_table.c:634:14: error: defining a type within '__builtin_offsetof' is a C23 extension [-Werror,-Wc23-extensions]
>
> ryoon@ said he'd take a look at it.
It seems that this breakage is caused from clang-19.
Keeping bazel as 6.4.0 may be dificult.
And updating bazel may require update of inputmethod/*mozc* packages.
I will update bazel and *mozc*. However it should not be for this freeze.
--
Ryo ONODERA // ryo%tetera.org@localhost
PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index