Re: NetBSD 10.0/x86_64 bulk build status

[Rob Whitlock <rwhitlock22%gmail.com@localhost>]

> On Jun 24, 2025, at 7:26 AM, Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost> wrote:
> 
> Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%pkgsrc.org@localhost> writes:
> 
>> Not necessarily a complaint, I understand why some might choose to do
>> that for some builds, especially when any change to the dependencies
>> of www/chromium will trigger a multi-day rebuild of a single package,
>> but it should probably be specifically stated in the report for each
>> such build, given it could lead to very misleading results.
> 
> In general, I think it would be nice if pbulk reports had much more
> metadata.   Seems like besides this
> 
>  compiler version
>  if sources from hg/git, latest commit info
> 
> and probably other things

If we are to start testing things with nonstandard options, then it
would be useful to be able to publish the mk.conf settings, as for
several packages, adding or disabling options requires adding
or disabling options for other packages.