Re: NetBSD 10.0/x86_64 bulk build status

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%pkgsrc.org@localhost> writes:

> Not necessarily a complaint, I understand why some might choose to do
> that for some builds, especially when any change to the dependencies
> of www/chromium will trigger a multi-day rebuild of a single package,
> but it should probably be specifically stated in the report for each
> such build, given it could lead to very misleading results.

In general, I think it would be nice if pbulk reports had much more
metadata.   Seems like besides this

  compiler version
  if sources from hg/git, latest commit info
  
and probably other things