Chavdar Ivanov <ci4ic4%gmail.com@localhost> writes: >> As it is, I can't tell if you tested what needs to be tested given the >> bootstrap commments. > > Not much, as I said. I just did 'make package' and that built clisp and sbcl, and both could add, so I called that good enough. It sounds like clisp being troubled on GNU/Linux is not an sbcl issue. >> > It might be nice to add an option to build the documentation (manual >> > gmake build in the doc/manual directory succeeds provided print/dvipsk >> > and devel/gtexinfo are available; I always build it manually locally >> > modifying the PLIST. >> >> Feel free to add wip/sbcl with that. > > I'll try. Otherwise I guess for now it should be ok just to bump the > version and remove the unnecessary patch. It was also necessary to prepare a commit message, which is one of the reasons I suggest wip, where COMMIT_MSG should be present with that work already done. I like Lisp (Scheme really, but it's family), and upstream NEWS was pretty good (plus listing individual bugfixes) so I did that myself this time.
Description: PGP signature