Chavdar Ivanov <ci4ic4%gmail.com@localhost> writes: > At present lang/sbcl is at version 2.1.10; the current version is > 2.2.5. Trivial replacement of the version number in Makefile and > distinfo, removal of patches/patch-src_runtime_run-program.c (NetBSD > conditionals apparently have been accepted upstream) is enough to get > it going; tested on NetBSD-current (amd64) and Ubuntu 20.04 (aarch64), > bootstrapped by an existing sbcl installation (lang/clisp failed > miserably under Ubuntu, btw, so I had to apt install older sbcl). I don't follow the bootstrapping issues. For pkgsrc, we require that starting from an empty pkgsrc installation "make package" works. That seems to be about using a clisp implementation that does build. (It's fine if people have workarounds on troubled systems; it's not fine if the plan is for everyone to have to deal.) As usual, feel free to drop an update in wip. As it is, I can't tell if you tested what needs to be tested given the bootstrap commments. > It might be nice to add an option to build the documentation (manual > gmake build in the doc/manual directory succeeds provided print/dvipsk > and devel/gtexinfo are available; I always build it manually locally > modifying the PLIST. Feel free to add wip/sbcl with that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature