[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Proposed package removals after 2016Q4
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 02:13:53PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 20.12.2016 13:56, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 01:45:28PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >> On 19.12.2016 21:57, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> >>> lang/gcc45
> >>> lang/gcc46
> >>> lang/gcc46-libs
> >>> lang/gcc47
> >>> lang/gcc47-libs
> >> Are these ones really necessary? They are still used.
> > By whom and why can't they use gcc48 or gcc49?
> > Joerg
> I use them and I don't need C++11 there.
> These packages are still officially maintained by sbd%NetBSD.org@localhost.
You haven't answered the second half of the question. Given that the
account of Steven is suspended, that doesn't account for much.
Main Index |
Thread Index |