On 20.12.2016 13:56, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 01:45:28PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> On 19.12.2016 21:57, Thomas Klausner wrote: >>> lang/gcc45 >>> lang/gcc46 >>> lang/gcc46-libs >>> lang/gcc47 >>> lang/gcc47-libs >>> >> >> Are these ones really necessary? They are still used. > > By whom and why can't they use gcc48 or gcc49? > > Joerg > I use them and I don't need C++11 there. These packages are still officially maintained by sbd%NetBSD.org@localhost.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature