pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Proposed package removals after 2016Q4

To: pkgsrc-users%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Proposed package removals after 2016Q4
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:56:21 +0100

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 01:45:28PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 19.12.2016 21:57, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > lang/gcc45
> > lang/gcc46
> > lang/gcc46-libs
> > lang/gcc47
> > lang/gcc47-libs
> > 
> 
> Are these ones really necessary? They are still used.

By whom and why can't they use gcc48 or gcc49?

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed package removals after 2016Q4
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

References:
- Proposed package removals after 2016Q4
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: Proposed package removals after 2016Q4
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: Proposed package removals after 2016Q4
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed package removals after 2016Q4
Next by Date: Re: Proposed package removals after 2016Q4
Previous by Thread: Re: Proposed package removals after 2016Q4
Next by Thread: Re: Proposed package removals after 2016Q4
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index