Re: pkg/50156: pkg_install.conf(5) wrong default file location description

[Pavel Timofeev <timp87%gmail.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/50156; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Pavel Timofeev <timp87%gmail.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/50156: pkg_install.conf(5) wrong default file location description
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:45:24 +0300

 I'm really sorry for such impolite bug report. I'm sorry for the
 "That's a mess" phrase. I didn't want to offend anyone!
 I'm sorry for such uninformative bug report. The file path for default
 file location in pkg_install.conf(5) on my system was
 '/usr/pkg/etc/pkg_install.conf'.
 I'm sorry to bother someone with this stupid bug report. Turns out, if
 you install any of package from remote repository using pkg_add it
 adds new set of pkg_install tools. So my man page was from pkg_install
 installed from packages while I tried use base pkg_install.
 I'm new to NetBSD and I haven't seen any NetBSD wiki pages (which
 describes how to install something from remote repository) that would
 emphasis "beware! there is another set of pkg_install tools which will
 be installed on your system. don't lost between them".
 
 Sorry again if I still misunderstand something!
 
 2015-08-23 15:20 GMT+03:00 Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/50156; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: pkg/50156: pkg_install.conf(5) wrong default file location
 >  description
 > Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 14:17:02 +0200
 >
 >  On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:25:00PM +0000, timp87%gmail.com@localhost wrote:
 >  > >Description:
 >  > I've spent a lot of time trying to understand why pkg_add ignores pkg_install.conf.
 >  > Reason: wrong file path for default file location in pkg_install.conf(5).
 >
 >  It would help if you told us what you see and what you expected to see.
 >  From what I can tell, the man page is fine.
 >
 >  Joerg
 >