"Jeremy C. Reed" <reed%reedmedia.net@localhost> writes: > (I had done lots of testing with dscp with BIND named and also > extensively tested and wrote about it for pfsense. I had no idea it was > in sshd/ssh nor did I think I had anything utilizing it.) I am not surprised if ssh is setting codepoints that basically are "low delay" for interactive use and "high throughput" for bulk data. I am surprised that anything is paying attention to DSCP codepoints (said as someone who has implemented multiple research systems with new prioritization controls). I am even further surprised that the codepoint used for ssh low delay would lead to bad behavior especially in the absence of congestion. It will be very interesting if you figure out what's going on; please post a followup.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature