Re: Alternative DVCS to git: hg?

[Johnny Billquist <bqt%update.uu.se@localhost>]

On 2019-04-17 14:42, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:33:15 +0000, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> > I'm not following again. If I make a commit, I would assume it shows up
> > afterwards if I check the log for the file. Are you saying it won't?
>
> Operative words being 'for the file'. Meaning yes, svn commits are
> atomic with respect to the files being committed, but not with
> respect to the full tree that is visible in your working copy.
>
> The naive assumption is that 'svn commit' makes a snapshot of the
> working copy tree as it now is - but it does not.

That's a weird assumption, I think. The "operative" word is commit. Not 
"snapshot" or "sync".
It commits your changes. That's all.

  Johnny

--
Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt%softjar.se@localhost             ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol