Re: __builtin_frame_address hogs cpu

[rudolf <netbsd%eq.cz@localhost>]

Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 01:18:56PM +0100, rudolf wrote:
> > I am curious if this behavior of __builtin_frame_address() is expected.
>
> Yes, calling it with args > 0 is not portable.

Right, but according to manpage, "in such cases a value 0 is returned". 
This seems not to be the case under NetBSD-6.1.3/amd64. Or am I missing 
something?

Thanks,

r.