NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: __builtin_frame_address hogs cpu

To: rudolf <netbsd%eq.cz@localhost>
Subject: Re: __builtin_frame_address hogs cpu
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:38:50 +0100

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 01:18:56PM +0100, rudolf wrote:
> I am curious if this behavior of __builtin_frame_address() is expected.

Yes, calling it with args > 0 is not portable.

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: __builtin_frame_address hogs cpu
  - From: rudolf

References:
- __builtin_frame_address hogs cpu
  - From: rudolf

Prev by Date: __builtin_frame_address hogs cpu
Next by Date: Re: __builtin_frame_address hogs cpu
Previous by Thread: __builtin_frame_address hogs cpu
Next by Thread: Re: __builtin_frame_address hogs cpu
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index