[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: RaidFrame Raid-1 problem (can't ditch a failing disk)
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:59:44 -0500
Louis Guillaume <louis%zabrico.com@localhost> wrote:
> On 2/28/10 11:33 AM, Greg Oster wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:49:53 -0500
> > Louis Guillaume<louis%zabrico.com@localhost> wrote:
> >> In this case, I had removed the failing drive, so we have sd0 on
> >> scsibus1. This drive normally shows up as sd1 on scsibus1, but IIRC that
> >> doesn't matter to RaidFrame, right?
> > Nope.
> Ok - wait a sec... Is that "nope it doesn't matter"? or "nope - wrong"? :)
Sorry... Should have said "correct." :) (i.e 'Nope, it doesn't
> >> At any rate, the same thing happens
> >> with a new blank (identical) disk in scsibus0.
> > The issue is that the rf_parity_map.c bits arn't checking to see if a
> > component is valid before attempting to get (and then use!) a component
> > label. I'll see if I can whip up a patch for you to test, if Jed
> > doesn't beat me to it... (I missed this issue when I was looking over
> > the paritymap stuff... :( )
> > This will also be a critical patch to get pulled up for NetBSD 5.1 as
> > well...
> Thank you for looking at this Greg. Let me know as soon as you have a
> patch. Should I file a PR for this?
Ya, please do.. .that'll make it easier to track for releng..
Main Index |
Thread Index |