[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/40384 (64 bit time_t broke wscons)
The following reply was made to PR kern/40384; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
Subject: Re: kern/40384 (64 bit time_t broke wscons)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:05:29 +0900 (JST)
> On Jan 14, 11:57pm, yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
> -- Subject: Re: kern/40384 (64 bit time_t broke wscons)
> | it flushes the queue, yes. but it seems unsafe to me.
> | eg. if malloc() sleeps.
> | eg. if someone is in the middle of wsevent_read().
> | necessary locking complicates the code more, i guess.
> Got it. Fixed.
well, have you checked whether it's safe even if every EVSIZE()
returns different values due to concurrent setversions?
with the way i suggested, only uiomove in wsevent_read and
_INJECT ioctl needs conversion, right? would it be so complicate?
Main Index |
Thread Index |