[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: help for OpenSSL update needed
Thus wrote Martin Husemann (martin%duskware.de@localhost):
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:30:27PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> > I also tested it on UltraSPARC-IIe. Both sparc64 and sparc (GENERIC32.UP
> > kernel from sparc64 and userland from sparc) version passed the 29 tests
> > in /usr/tests/crypto/libcrypto.
> The sparc64 tests work for me too, but sparc on 32bit hardware
> fails a few tests by timing out:
> t_libcrypto (4/5): 6 test cases
> bn: [300.074482s] Failed: Test case timed out after 300 seconds
> t_pubkey (5/5): 7 test cases
> dh: [22.872256s] Passed.
> dsa: [23.997709s] Passed.
> ec: [301.048359s] Failed: Test case timed out after 300 seconds
> ecdh: [66.262402s] Passed.
> ecdsa: [301.034882s] Failed: Test case timed out after 300 seconds
> rsa: [299.283552s] Failed: Test case timed out after 300 seconds
if you run:
directly, they ought to be very talkative and tell you at which test of
the respective functions they get stuck. I hope all four have a common
> > # Some .S files in arch/sparc* are generated but not used. Is this OK?
That's mostly me being a completionist. Makes working on checking if they
have an advantage and activating them if yes at a later date easier.
> Maybe that is related?
If you don't use an ASM method it should fall back to C and that should
always work, just be a bit slower, and most of the ASM in sparc only kicks
in if MACHINE is sparc64.
Main Index |
Thread Index |