tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 16bit ctype table

On Sep 24, 2012, at 11:58 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:58:12AM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>>> how do you think about BUILDCOLD/_COMPAT_BSDCTYPE?
>>> I don't think it helps that much, what to remove is documented.
>> as there are many changes waiting for the major bump, it's desirable
>> to make the work necessary on bump minimal.
> Attached patch includes __BUILDCOLD define that can be used for other
> purposes in this area.

__BUILDOLDC might be better since __BUILDCOLD parses as __BUILD-COLD

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index