Re: 16bit ctype table

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:56:37AM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> hi,
> 
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:02:53AM +0900, Takehiko NOZAKI wrote:
> >> we have to go with _CTYPE_* == _RUNETYPE_* ordering from the start.
> > 
> > Attached version would be doing that. I don't think it is really an
> > improvement in this case though.
> > 
> > Joerg
> 
> does it mean it's now almost identical to tnozaki's version?

It is functionally equivalent, I think,

> how do you think about BUILDCOLD/_COMPAT_BSDCTYPE?

I don't think it helps that much, what to remove is documented.

Joerg