[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: 16bit ctype table
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:56:37AM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:02:53AM +0900, Takehiko NOZAKI wrote:
> >> we have to go with _CTYPE_* == _RUNETYPE_* ordering from the start.
> > Attached version would be doing that. I don't think it is really an
> > improvement in this case though.
> > Joerg
> does it mean it's now almost identical to tnozaki's version?
It is functionally equivalent, I think,
> how do you think about BUILDCOLD/_COMPAT_BSDCTYPE?
I don't think it helps that much, what to remove is documented.
Main Index |
Thread Index |