tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 16bit ctype table


> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:02:53AM +0900, Takehiko NOZAKI wrote:
>> we have to go with _CTYPE_* == _RUNETYPE_* ordering from the start.
> Attached version would be doing that. I don't think it is really an
> improvement in this case though.
> Joerg

does it mean it's now almost identical to tnozaki's version?

how do you think about BUILDCOLD/_COMPAT_BSDCTYPE?


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index