tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 16bit ctype table

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:42:27AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:02:53AM +0900, Takehiko NOZAKI wrote:
> > we have to go with _CTYPE_* == _RUNETYPE_* ordering from the start.
> Attached version would be doing that. I don't think it is really an
> improvement in this case though.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index