tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 16bit ctype table

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: 16bit ctype table
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:57:13 +0200

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:42:27AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:02:53AM +0900, Takehiko NOZAKI wrote:
> > we have to go with _CTYPE_* == _RUNETYPE_* ordering from the start.
> 
> Attached version would be doing that. I don't think it is really an
> improvement in this case though.

Ping.

References:
- 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Takehiko NOZAKI
- Re: 16bit ctype table
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: individual software releases for third parties
Next by Date: ac(8) relicensed to a 2-clause BSD license
Previous by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Next by Thread: Re: 16bit ctype table
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index