[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: should we ship linkable gmp/mpfr/mpc or hide them?
---- On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:30:49 -0700 Alistair Crooks wrote ----
>I'm against installing gmp in base (and all the others as well). The
>fact that other packages use them is neither here nor there - it's a
>matter for pkgsrc, not base - and the builtin recognition should just
>dtrt with versions. Where I have problems is that nothing else needs
>them in base, and I'm still unsure why a compiler needs
>multi-precision arithmetic. To me, this is just bloat, is not
>required, wanted, desired or even "might be nice if we had it".
One area it is required, wanted and desired in any C compiler is
for decimal->binary conversions.
Previously GCC had bugs in this area, as it had limited precision
arithmetic, meaning that even conversion of decimal to float had
My bug report:
Of course, having decided to integrate GMP to fix the problem,
they now use it for all kinds of other compile-time transformations.
Main Index |
Thread Index |