tech-toolchain archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*

> > I can't answer it because I don't see how things like
> > "Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*" affect on creating
> > binary patches. We can simply create binary patches
> > from two sets of DESTDIR, can't we?
> > 
> > Anyway, smaller binaries are not so important in these days
> > and independent binary replacement mechanism (which can be
> > handled like pkg_add(1)) is better for ordinary users, I think.
> For ordinary users yes, for serious users no.  If you have 1,000 production
> machines running NetBSD, you surely don't want to install binary updates of
> features you don't use.

Hmm, then could you please answer my first question?
Izumi Tsutsui

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index