tech-toolchain archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*

> I can't answer it because I don't see how things like
> "Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*" affect on creating
> binary patches. We can simply create binary patches
> from two sets of DESTDIR, can't we?
> Anyway, smaller binaries are not so important in these days
> and independent binary replacement mechanism (which can be
> handled like pkg_add(1)) is better for ordinary users, I think.

For ordinary users yes, for serious users no.  If you have 1,000 production
machines running NetBSD, you surely don't want to install binary updates of
features you don't use.


Masao Uebayashi / Tombi Inc. / Tel: +81-90-9141-4635

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index