tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Switching default version of PHP/RUBY and retirement...



Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost> writes:

>>> Is the continued existence of php56 causing anyone work?
>>
>> Yes. For example, I'm regularly reading bulk build reports and
>> currently there are php56-imagemagick and (in some) php56-intl there -
>> I have to remember if it was broken before or if I should investigate
>> it for recent breakage.
>
> I think you mean graphics/php-imagick, and I looked at that briefly.  It
> doesn't seem to be a php56 issue.   It looks like upstream expects
> pkg-config and we don't have USE_TOOLS.  I added that and it helped a
> lot.  But now I'm running into the problem that my build has not bl3d
> pkgsrc fontconfig but apparently ImageMagick itself did.

This is really seeming like a fontconfig bl3 bug.  fontconfig's bl3 sets
ABI_DEPENDS high enough that fontconfig from xsrc on n9 is not new
enough.  USE_BUILTIN.fontconfig gets set to no.  But then in
work/.buildlink/.buildlink_fontconfig_done:

  /tmp/work/graphics/php-imagick/work/.x11-buildlink/include/fontconfig/fcfreetype.h -> /usr/X11R7/include/fontconfig/fcfreetype.h
  /tmp/work/graphics/php-imagick/work/.x11-buildlink/include/fontconfig/fcprivate.h -> /usr/X11R7/include/fontconfig/fcprivate.h
  /tmp/work/graphics/php-imagick/work/.x11-buildlink/include/fontconfig/fontconfig.h -> /usr/X11R7/include/fontconfig/fontconfig.h
  /tmp/work/graphics/php-imagick/work/.x11-buildlink/lib/libfontconfig.a -> /usr/X11R7/lib/libfontconfig.a
  /tmp/work/graphics/php-imagick/work/.x11-buildlink/lib/libfontconfig.so -> /usr/X11R7/lib/libfontconfig.so
  /tmp/work/graphics/php-imagick/work/.x11-buildlink/lib/pkgconfig/fontconfig.pc -> /usr/X11R7/lib/pkgconfig/fontconfig.pc

ImageMagick seems to do this too despite base pkgconfig being
  Version: 2.13.1
and make show-depends saysing
  fontconfig>=2.14.2nb3:../../fonts/fontconfig

Maybe it will build for you with pkg-config, and the fontconfig issue is
a separate, unrelated bug?





Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index