Re: New options for freeswitch

["D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 03:53:20 +0400
Aleksej Saushev <asau%inbox.ru@localhost> wrote:
> > So, this discussion has gone far afield.  The original question was
> > what to use as option names.  Does anyone have an opinion on that
> > regardless of any of these other questions?
> 
> "Bitrate" is less cryptical in my opinion, but I still doubt it is

Sounds good.

> reasonable to introdue those as options. I'd prefer if they were
> several packages, since it simplifies handling (you can provide
> binary packages, package failures are more visible, e.g. in pbulk).

The first part of this package (freeswitch-music) is ready to commit.
I think I will commit it as is for now.  We can always repaint the shed
later.  I really want to get to the base package.

I am going with your suggestion of bitrate.  I am making the 8K one
"bitrate08k" so that the options are in ascending order.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy%NetBSD.org@localhost>
http://www.NetBSD.org/ IM:darcy%Vex.Net@localhost