Re: New options for freeswitch

[Aleksej Saushev <asau%inbox.ru@localhost>]

"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes:

> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:00:03 +0200
> Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
>> Why bother selecting? Can't you just install all encodings?
>
> Size?
>
> 18M     8000
> 36M     16000
> 73M     32000
> 109M    48000
>
> So, this discussion has gone far afield.  The original question was
> what to use as option names.  Does anyone have an opinion on that
> regardless of any of these other questions?

"Bitrate" is less cryptical in my opinion, but I still doubt it is
reasonable to introdue those as options. I'd prefer if they were
several packages, since it simplifies handling (you can provide
binary packages, package failures are more visible, e.g. in pbulk).


-- 
HE CE3OH...