tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bsd.own.mk - Re: pkg/44425: devel/lua-alt-getopt install problem
At 23:30 Uhr +0100 20.01.2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> may I ask you to look at the above patch before venting, and tell me where,
>> in your view, it goes wrong?
>
>It doesn't fix any of the other side effects.
Like what? Care to elaborate?
> Haev you considered
>looking through bsd.own.mk first for why you hit this in first place?
Again, what are you referring to?
>> Arguably, <bsd.own.mk> has no business configuring install target related
>> variables (here: INSTPRIV) when you (or pkgsrc) set NEED_OWN_INSTALL_TARGET
>> in order to signal you'll take care of installation yourself.
>
>NEED_OWN_INSTALL_TARGET is a red hering.
<snip>
#
# NEED_OWN_INSTALL_TARGET is set to "no" by pkgsrc/mk/bsd.pkg.mk to
# ensure that things defined by <bsd.own.mk> (default targets,
# INSTALL_FILE, etc.) are not conflicting with bsd.pkg.mk.
#
NEED_OWN_INSTALL_TARGET?= yes
</snip>
which should naturally cover any variables which influence install(8).
What is lacking here, your idiomatic expressions, or your reading skills?
But... suit yourself. I can easily maintain a one-line patch locally, and
if anybody else should run into the issue, there's always the list archive.
hauke
--
The ASCII Ribbon Campaign Hauke Fath
() No HTML/RTF in email Institut für Nachrichtentechnik
/\ No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt
Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-3281
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index