[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Specifying names for tap interfaces
Christos Zoulas wrote:
On Jul 5, 9:37am, roger.pau%citrix.com@localhost (Roger Pau Monne) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Specifying names for tap interfaces
| Sorry, I've replied to this thread using my cell phone once, and it
| seems the messages didn't get to the list because they where in HTML.
Ah, no problem.
| I didn't intend to solve the Qemu issue using this patch, since this
| feature will not be present in NetBSD 6, and I aim for new Qemu present
| in Xen unstable (4.2) to work with NetBSD 6.
| I haven't tried yet, but I assume passing the fd to Qemu will work, and
| I plan on using that to fix the Qemu problem. Anyway I had this half
| done, because I think it's an interesting feature, not only as a fix to
| the Qemu issue.
Yes, but it is a solution looking for a problem. Until we actually have
a use that makes this feature necessary, we should not add it just to avoid
creeping featurism and complexity.
| For example being able to name Xen virtual interfaces in
| the Dom0 with a user defined name (both tap and vif), but I'm sure other
| users will come up with other uses.
Yes, that's nice, but purely cosmetic.
It allows users to have persistent interfaces, even after Dom0/DomU
reboot, so you can for example graph the traffic a single guest is
using, which is not possible now.
Main Index |
Thread Index |