tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close?

To: tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost, tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:51:45 +0200

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:55:51PM -0400, Thor Simon wrote:
> Can anyone tell me why, exactly, we shouldn't remove bound AF_LOCAL
> sockets from the filesystem on last close?

If you want to do that, wouldn't it be easier to just go the Linux route
and move them into a separate (virtual) namespace completely?

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close?
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close?
  - From: Matthew Mondor

References:
- why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close?
  - From: Thor Simon

Prev by Date: Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close?
Next by Date: Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close?
Previous by Thread: Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close?
Next by Thread: Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index