Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0

[Reinoud Zandijk <reinoud%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:06:27AM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 07:45:08 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > How does that compare to the level of damage non-journaled FFS takes?
> 
> From then on, the sandbox was easily recoverable after every panic. It 
> turned out fsck times on a moderately-sized SSD were bearable - 
> certainly shorter than writing cleanup scripts, throwing out half of 
> the sandbox, and 'cvs update'ing the rest.

I disabled WAPBL on my SSD too; it is `only' 232 GB and fsck-ing indeed takes
a very short time, especially when comparing it to my rotational discs :)

Reinoud