On 22.11.2019 02:42, Robert Elz wrote: > Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:04:56 +0100 > From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> > Message-ID: <1a9d9b40-42fe-be08-d7b3-e6ecead5b55f%gmx.com@localhost> > > > | I think that picking C11 terminology is the way forward. > > Use a name like that iff the intent is to also exactly match the > semantics implied, otherwise it will only create more confusion. > > kre > I think this matches. We want to make operation in 'single operation' (or looking like so) and 'atomic' is a settled name in English (there are options like: 'integral', 'intrinsic', 'elemental', 'essential', 'fundamental' or 'single operation'). If there are stronger feelings against it, I would go for '__write_singleop()', '__read_singleop()'.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature