Re: __{read,write}_once

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 08:42:19AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
>     Date:        Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:04:56 +0100
>     From:        Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
>     Message-ID:  <1a9d9b40-42fe-be08-d7b3-e6ecead5b55f%gmx.com@localhost>
> 
> 
>   | I think that picking C11 terminology is the way forward.
> 
> Use a name like that iff the intent is to also exactly match the
> semantics implied, otherwise it will only create more confusion.

And if the implied semantics isn't even totally clear, do not hide
it behind a macro at all?

Martin